Yearly report 1.1.2020-29.3.2024

« Back

Changes compared to previous years

Compare group:   Year 2024 (51 pcs) |   Year 2023 (61 pcs) |   Year 2022 (53 pcs) |   Year 2021 (147 pcs) |   Year 2020 (110 pcs) |   Year 2019 (425 pcs) |   Year 2018 (475 pcs) |   Year 2017 (673 pcs) |   Year 2016 (1 pcs)

Hint: click a row for details

Questions with more positive answers than the compare group
The school has a pedagogical development team for ICT use.***
See question distribution: The school has a pedagogical development team for ICT use.
Own answers average 0.4
Compare group answers average -0.8
Statistical significance p < 0.0001 (clearly evident difference)
Development measures are carried out based on evaluation and changes are communicated regularly.*
See question distribution: Development measures are carried out based on evaluation and changes are communicated regularly.
Own answers average 0.6
Compare group answers average 0.3
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Students are allowed to use their own devices for learning at school.*
See question distribution: Students are allowed to use their own devices for learning at school.
Own answers average 1.7
Compare group answers average 1.1
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
I have utilized the results of Opeka in the development of my work.*
See question distribution: I have utilized the results of Opeka in the development of my work.
Own answers average -0.6
Compare group answers average -1.1
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
In my school peer teachers are providing ICT guiding.*
See question distribution: In my school peer teachers are providing ICT guiding.
Own answers average 1.6
Compare group answers average 1.4
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
The school’s organisational culture enables various large-scale teaching experiments involving several different teachers and subjects.*
See question distribution: The school’s organisational culture enables various large-scale teaching experiments involving several different teachers and subjects.
Own answers average 1.3
Compare group answers average 1.1
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Good practices are presented to the working community on a regular basis and the working community is encouraged to experiment.*
See question distribution: Good practices are presented to the working community on a regular basis and the working community is encouraged to experiment.
Own answers average 0.8
Compare group answers average 0.6
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Good practices spread into working models used by several teachers within an entire year or subject group, for example.*
See question distribution: Good practices spread into working models used by several teachers within an entire year or subject group, for example.
Own answers average 1.2
Compare group answers average 1.0
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Teachers develop new practices in support of digitalisation.*
See question distribution: Teachers develop new practices in support of digitalisation.
Own answers average 0.9
Compare group answers average 0.8
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Utilisation of good practices covers the entire learning community and people are able to take pleasure in experiments even when they fail.*
See question distribution: Utilisation of good practices covers the entire learning community and people are able to take pleasure in experiments even when they fail.
Own answers average 0.9
Compare group answers average 0.7
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
ICT skills are discussed as part of performance reviews.*
See question distribution: ICT skills are discussed as part of performance reviews.
Own answers average 1.2
Compare group answers average 1.0
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
The pedagogical opportunities relating to digital technology have been clearly internalised in the working community.*
See question distribution: The pedagogical opportunities relating to digital technology have been clearly internalised in the working community.
Own answers average 0.9
Compare group answers average 0.8
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Questions with more negative answers than the compare group
I find the network capacity sufficient.**
See question distribution: I find the network capacity sufficient.
Own answers average 0.9
Compare group answers average 1.6
Statistical significance p < 0.01 (very significant difference)

*) The amount of stars implies the statistical significance