Suomeksi På Svenska
Yearly report 1.1.2015-20.4.2025

« Back

Changes compared to previous years

Compare group: Year 2025 (8 pcs) | Year 2024 (100 pcs) | Year 2023 (61 pcs) | Year 2022 (53 pcs) | Year 2021 (147 pcs) | Year 2020 (110 pcs) | Year 2019 (425 pcs) | Year 2018 (475 pcs) | Year 2017 (673 pcs) | Year 2016 (1 pcs)

Hint: click a row for details

Questions with more positive answers than the compare group
ICT skills are discussed as part of performance reviews.* See question distribution: ICT skills are discussed as part of performance reviews. Own answers average 1.3 Compare group answers average 0.9 Statistical significance p < 0.001** (evident difference)
Good practices are presented to the working community on a regular basis and the working community is encouraged to experiment.* See question distribution: Good practices are presented to the working community on a regular basis and the working community is encouraged to experiment. Own answers average 0.9 Compare group answers average 0.7 Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Teachers seek alternative pedagogical models in support of teaching.* See question distribution: Teachers seek alternative pedagogical models in support of teaching. Own answers average 1.1 Compare group answers average 1.0 Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)

Questions with more negative answers than the compare group
The employer has made computers available for teachers’ personal use.* See question distribution: The employer has made computers available for teachers’ personal use. Own answers average 1.1 Compare group answers average 1.9 Statistical significance p < 0.00001** (clearly evident difference)
The school has a wireless network connection.* See question distribution: The school has a wireless network connection. Own answers average 2.0 Compare group answers average 2.0 Statistical significance p < 0.0001** (clearly evident difference)
In my school peer teachers are providing ICT guiding. See question distribution: In my school peer teachers are providing ICT guiding. Own answers average 1.5 Compare group answers average 1.7 Statistical significance p < 0.01** (very significant difference)
The quality characteristics of digital network and learning environments are assessed regularly. See question distribution: The quality characteristics of digital network and learning environments are assessed regularly. Own answers average 0.3 Compare group answers average 0.7 Statistical significance p < 0.01** (very significant difference)
The school has at least one teacher tutor providing other teachers with support in the pedagogical use of information and communications technology. See question distribution: The school has at least one teacher tutor providing other teachers with support in the pedagogical use of information and communications technology. Own answers average 1.6 Compare group answers average 1.8 Statistical significance p < 0.01** (very significant difference)
Target level: The whole school community is engaged in change brought about by digitalisation. Please choose the description below that best fits your school’s situation, even if it is not fully accurate in all respects: See question distribution: Target level: The whole school community is engaged in change brought about by digitalisation. Please choose the description below that best fits your school’s situation, even if it is not fully accurate in all respects: Own answers average 0.1 Compare group answers average 0.4 Statistical significance p < 0.01** (very significant difference)
Digital network and learning environments are up to date.* See question distribution: Digital network and learning environments are up to date. Own answers average 0.9 Compare group answers average 1.2 Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
The school has technical support available for the use of information technology.* See question distribution: The school has technical support available for the use of information technology. Own answers average 1.7 Compare group answers average 1.8 Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
The pedagogical opportunities relating to digital technology have been clearly internalised in the working community.* See question distribution: The pedagogical opportunities relating to digital technology have been clearly internalised in the working community. Own answers average 0.8 Compare group answers average 0.9 Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
I master the key information technology environments and digital methods used for teaching and learning purposes.* See question distribution: I master the key information technology environments and digital methods used for teaching and learning purposes. Own answers average 0.9 Compare group answers average 1.1 Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
I have utilized the results of Opeka in the development of my work.* See question distribution: I have utilized the results of Opeka in the development of my work. Own answers average -1.0 Compare group answers average -0.6 Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Students are allowed to use their own devices for learning at school.* See question distribution: Students are allowed to use their own devices for learning at school. Own answers average 1.7 Compare group answers average 1.8 Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
I find the network capacity sufficient.* See question distribution: I find the network capacity sufficient. Own answers average 0.8 Compare group answers average 1.2 Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)

*) The amount of stars implies the statistical significance

This report shows answers between 1.1.2015 and 20.4.2025. Information on this page is fixed.