Yearly report 31.12.2018-17.6.2019

« Back

Changes compared to previous years

Compare group:   Year 2024 (6 pcs) |   Year 2023 (61 pcs) |   Year 2022 (53 pcs) |   Year 2021 (147 pcs) |   Year 2020 (110 pcs) |   Year 2019 (425 pcs) |   Year 2018 (475 pcs) |   Year 2017 (673 pcs) |   Year 2016 (1 pcs)

Hint: click a row for details

Questions with more positive answers than the compare group
I am familiar with the content of the plan guiding ICT development work in my town.***
See question distribution: I am familiar with the content of the plan guiding ICT development work in my town.
Own answers average 1.2
Compare group answers average 1.0
Statistical significance p < 0.00001 (clearly evident difference)
Teachers seek alternative pedagogical models in support of teaching.*
See question distribution: Teachers seek alternative pedagogical models in support of teaching.
Own answers average 1.1
Compare group answers average 0.8
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Questions with more negative answers than the compare group
I find the network capacity sufficient.***
See question distribution: I find the network capacity sufficient.
Own answers average 0.7
Compare group answers average 2.0
Statistical significance p < 0.00001 (clearly evident difference)
Target level: The whole school community is engaged in change brought about by digitalisation.

Please choose the description below that best fits your school’s situation, even if it is not fully accurate in all respects:***
See question distribution: Target level: The whole school community is engaged in change brought about by digitalisation.

Please choose the description below that best fits your school’s situation, even if it is not fully accurate in all respects:

Own answers average 0.1
Compare group answers average 0.7
Statistical significance p < 0.00001 (clearly evident difference)
The progress made in digitalisation is evaluated in relation to the school’s jointly agreed objectives in a systematic and regular manner.***
See question distribution: The progress made in digitalisation is evaluated in relation to the school’s jointly agreed objectives in a systematic and regular manner.
Own answers average 0.4
Compare group answers average 1.0
Statistical significance p < 0.00001 (clearly evident difference)
Target level: Schools have practices in place for jointly developing and sharing competences within the organisation.

Please choose the description below that best fits your school’s situation, even if it is not fully accurate in all respects:***
The employer has made computers available for teachers’ personal use.***
See question distribution: The employer has made computers available for teachers’ personal use.
Own answers average 1.2
Compare group answers average 2.0
Statistical significance p < 0.00001 (clearly evident difference)
Students are allowed to use their own devices for learning at school.***
See question distribution: Students are allowed to use their own devices for learning at school.
Own answers average 1.7
Compare group answers average 2.0
Statistical significance p < 0.00001 (clearly evident difference)
The pedagogical opportunities relating to digital technology have been clearly internalised in the working community.***
See question distribution: The pedagogical opportunities relating to digital technology have been clearly internalised in the working community.
Own answers average 0.8
Compare group answers average 1.0
Statistical significance p < 0.001 (evident difference)
The whole school community and stakeholders have been engaged in the digitalisation development process and parents are also aware of the progress made in change.*
See question distribution: The whole school community and stakeholders have been engaged in the digitalisation development process and parents are also aware of the progress made in change.
Own answers average 0.4
Compare group answers average 0.8
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Objectives relating to digitalisation have been defined for each individual teacher.*
See question distribution: Objectives relating to digitalisation have been defined for each individual teacher.
Own answers average 0.1
Compare group answers average 0.7
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
The quality characteristics of digital network and learning environments are assessed regularly.*
See question distribution: The quality characteristics of digital network and learning environments are assessed regularly.
Own answers average 0.4
Compare group answers average 1.0
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
My school’s development and continuing training plan relating to digitalisation is up to date.*
See question distribution: My school’s development and continuing training plan relating to digitalisation is up to date.
Own answers average 0.5
Compare group answers average 1.0
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
I have utilized the results of Opeka in the development of my work.*
See question distribution: I have utilized the results of Opeka in the development of my work.
Own answers average -0.9
Compare group answers average 0.7
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
My school has a jointly agreed objective for making use of ICT in education.*
See question distribution: My school has a jointly agreed objective for making use of ICT in education.
Own answers average 0.9
Compare group answers average 1.2
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Teachers are able to describe their pedagogical and technical ICT skills and development needs.*
See question distribution: Teachers are able to describe their pedagogical and technical ICT skills and development needs.
Own answers average 1.0
Compare group answers average 1.3
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Digital network and learning environments are up to date.*
See question distribution: Digital network and learning environments are up to date.
Own answers average 1.0
Compare group answers average 1.5
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Good practices are presented to the working community on a regular basis and the working community is encouraged to experiment.*
See question distribution: Good practices are presented to the working community on a regular basis and the working community is encouraged to experiment.
Own answers average 0.9
Compare group answers average 1.2
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)
Good practices spread into working models used by several teachers within an entire year or subject group, for example.*
See question distribution: Good practices spread into working models used by several teachers within an entire year or subject group, for example.
Own answers average 1.0
Compare group answers average 1.4
Statistical significance p < 0.1 (significant difference)

*) The amount of stars implies the statistical significance